Head to head
Agility CMS vs Contentful
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
38/100 | 57/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #9 | #4 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 70 | 71 |
| AI Authority | 0 | 61 |
| Web Authority | 21 | 21 |
| Expert Assessment | 63 | 66 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published · free tier: None confirmed on the current vendor site; only a demo request path and a free trial claimed by third-party aggregators | $300/month (Lite) · free tier: Free $0/forever: 10 users, 2 roles (Admin, Editor), 2 locales, 100,000 API calls/month, 50 GB CDN bandwidth/month, 1 Starter Space, 50 MB asset uploads, community support only, hard usage caps instead of overages |
| Pricing model | Custom | Subscription with usage overages and paid add-ons |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise organisations with multiple brands or regions, a marketing team that must publish without developer tickets, a Next.js/Nuxt/Astro/.NET front end, a SOC 2 or GovRAMP procurement checklist, and tolerance for annual enterprise contracting — particularly North American buyers migrating off WordPress, Sitecore or AEM. | Mid-market and enterprise teams with dedicated in-house developers, multi-brand or multi-channel content, high API volumes and an actual content-governance function — especially those wanting personalization and experimentation native to the CMS. |
| Avoid if | You are a solo developer, startup or agency needing a free or low-cost tier and self-serve signup, you want to know the price before talking to sales, you require open-source or self-hosted control, or you are buying specifically for mature GA AI authoring features. | You are a startup, small business or single-site project on a budget, need more than three locales without jumping to Enterprise, have no developer resource, or require guaranteed support response times without an Enterprise contract. |
| Markets | Mid-Market, Enterprise, Public sector adjacent, Multi-brand marketing teams | Mid-Market, Enterprise, SMB (limited fit), Agencies |
| Founded | 2003 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.