Head to head
Agility CMS vs Sanity
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
38/100 | 63/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #9 | #1 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 70 | 84 |
| AI Authority | 0 | 78 |
| Web Authority | 21 | 11 |
| Expert Assessment | 63 | 65 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published · free tier: None confirmed on the current vendor site; only a demo request path and a free trial claimed by third-party aggregators | $15 per seat/month (Growth) · free tier: Free forever: up to 20 user seats plus free viewers, 2 public-only datasets, 10k documents, 1m API CDN requests/mo, 250k API requests/mo, 100GB assets and bandwidth, 1000 AI credits/mo, 500K function invocations/mo, community support only, no overage purchasing |
| Pricing model | Custom | Subscription (per seat) with usage-based overages |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise organisations with multiple brands or regions, a marketing team that must publish without developer tickets, a Next.js/Nuxt/Astro/.NET front end, a SOC 2 or GovRAMP procurement checklist, and tolerance for annual enterprise contracting — particularly North American buyers migrating off WordPress, Sitecore or AEM. | Developer-led product and engineering teams on React/Next.js stacks who want the editing UI defined in code, plus freelancers and small agencies exploiting the 20-seat free tier with full AI features. |
| Avoid if | You are a solo developer, startup or agency needing a free or low-cost tier and self-serve signup, you want to know the price before talking to sales, you require open-source or self-hosted control, or you are buying specifically for mature GA AI authoring features. | You are a marketing team without engineering support, need SSO/audit logs/SLA on a published budget, need many datasets or environments on a mid-market budget, have more than 50 editors, or require invoicing below Enterprise. |
| Markets | Mid-Market, Enterprise, Public sector adjacent, Multi-brand marketing teams | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise, Agencies, Freelancers |
| Founded | 2003 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.