Head to head

AMP Futures vs Plus500 US

Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.

 
53/100Higher score
51/100
Category rank#2#5
ConfidenceMedium confidenceHigh confidence
External Reputation7086
AI Authority554
Web Authority1655
Expert Assessment6757
TOP10 User Score
PricingCommissions as low as $0.15 per side + fees (top volume tier) · free tier: None; promotional '20 Commission-Free Trades' offer, with customers still responsible for exchange, clearing, NFA, data, platform and technology feesNot published · free tier: None
Pricing modelUsage-based (per-side commission, volume-tiered)Usage-based
Best forModerate-to-high volume futures day traders who already know which charting/execution platform they want, value a CME clearing member and low per-side cost, and are comfortable calculating exchange, data and platform fees themselves.US traders who want micro and mini futures contracts from a large international brand — but only after independently verifying the current fee schedule and NFA BASIC record on the vendor's US site.
Avoid if You want one all-in price on one bundled platform, need equities/ETFs/equity options alongside futures, trade infrequently, or rely on leveraged intraday size through FOMC and major data releases. You need a fully documented, comparable fee schedule up front, care about verified user reviews and disciplinary history, or expect the global Plus500 CFD product range, which is unavailable to US residents.
MarketsRetail self-directed traders, Active/high-volume day traders, International futures tradersRetail traders
Founded
Headquarters221 N LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL, USA

A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.