Head to head

Capital.com Smart Portfolios vs IG

Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.

 
50/100Higher score
47/100
Category rank#3#7
ConfidenceHigh confidenceHigh confidence
External Reputation8076
AI Authority65
Web Authority5942
Expert Assessment5266
TOP10 User Score
PricingNot published — no subscription tiers; costs are spread-based (e.g. EUR/USD 0.6 pips, Gold 0.30 points, UK 100 1 point, Apple 0.13 points, Bitcoin 50 points) · free tier: Demo account available; no subscription required to hold a live accountCommission-free investing; CFD minimum spreads from 0.3 bps (Spot Gold) / 0.4 (S&P 500) / 0.6 (EUR/USD) · free tier: No subscription; account opening, closing and maintenance are free and there is no inactivity fee on CFD and spread betting accounts
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Best forActive, self-directed CFD traders who place their own trades and want tight spreads with no commission.Active UK traders who want CFDs or spread betting plus an ISA/SIPP with one provider, value platform choice (MT4, TradingView, ProRealTime, DMA) and trade intermittently enough that a rival's dormancy fee would bite.
Avoid if You are shopping for copy trading or managed portfolios — that capability does not exist here, and a 79.75% retail loss rate makes leveraged CFDs an unsuitable default for hands-off users. You need guaranteed fast withdrawals or responsive human support, trade news events at high frequency, deal in altcoins outside BTC/ETH/SOL at 1.49%, or are inexperienced — IG's own site states 69% of its retail accounts lose money.
MarketsRetail traders, Professional tradersRetail traders, Professional clients, Institutional (IG Prime)
Founded1974
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom

A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.