Head to head
Gemini ActiveTrader vs Kraken Pro
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
52/100Higher score | 50/100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #1 | #3 |
| Confidence | High confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 66 | 15 |
| AI Authority | 34 | 81 |
| Web Authority | 49 | 51 |
| Expert Assessment | 61 | 64 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Entry tier 0.600% maker / 1.200% taker per spot trade · free tier: None — no subscription; select stablecoin pairs (RLUSD/USD, USDC/GUSD, GUSD/USD) trade at 0.00% maker and 0.00% taker | 0.40% maker / 0.80% taker on spot crypto at Tier 1 ($0+ volume) · free tier: None — no subscription; Tier 1 spot pricing is 0.40% maker / 0.80% taker |
| Pricing model | Usage-based (tiered maker/taker trading fees; no subscription) | Usage-based (per-trade maker/taker fees; no subscription for Kraken Pro) |
| Best for | US-based traders doing $250K–$1M+ monthly volume or holding $1M+, and API/algo traders, who want NYDFS-supervised custody and will trade patiently with maker limit orders. | Active order-book traders doing $10k+/month, API and margin traders, stablecoin/FX pair traders, and long-term holders with $20k+ on-platform who can passively buy down their fee tier. |
| Avoid if | You trade under roughly $10K a month, need same-day human support, cannot tolerate a multi-week account freeze, or are a leveraged trader sensitive to a 26.3% USD carry cost. | You are a buy-and-hold retail user who will never open the Pro interface (you will pay 1%-1.5% plus spread), you cannot accept exchange custody risk given the visible 'funds on hold' complaint theme, you use leverage and are sensitive to a 2% liquidation fee, or you are outside the US wanting stocks or in a restricted geo for Perps. |
| Markets | Active traders, High-volume/professional traders, API and algorithmic traders, Institutions | Retail traders, Active/professional traders, API and algorithmic traders, High-balance holders, OTC / institutional |
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.