Head to head
Harness vs CircleCI
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
19/100 | 58/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #9 | #3 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | — | 79 |
| AI Authority | 7 | 64 |
| Web Authority | 21 | 18 |
| Expert Assessment | 38 | 57 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published · free tier: Not verified (a December 2024 third-party blog claims a free plan with 2,000 monthly cloud credits; not vendor-confirmed) | From $15/month (Performance) · free tier: $0/month, no credit card: 30,000 credits/month (page also claims up to 6,000 build minutes), up to 5 active users, 1 GB network, 2 GB storage, 30x concurrency (macOS concurrency 1), Docker layer caching, private orbs, 5 self-hosted runner tasks; credits expire monthly with no rollover |
| Pricing model | Not verified — vendor pricing page could not be retrieved | Credit-based (usage-based, prepaid credits) |
| Best for | Cannot be determined from verified evidence; re-run required once vendor pricing and product pages plus G2/Capterra scores are retrievable. | Teams needing heterogeneous compute (Linux + Arm + Windows + macOS or GPU jobs) in one pipeline, with bursty build volume they can absorb via high concurrency, plus open-source projects and qualifying startups exploiting the large free credit allowances. |
| Avoid if | You need a firm published price before evaluation, or a documented compliance posture — neither could be verified in this dossier. | You need SSO or policy-as-code without an annual sales contract, require a predictable flat monthly bill and cannot accept auto-refill plus forfeiture-on-cancellation, are already deep in a GitHub-native workflow, or want minimal YAML authoring. |
| Markets | — | Startup, SMB, Enterprise, Open source projects |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.