Head to head

Interactive Brokers vs Trading 212

Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.

 
66/100Higher score
63/100
Category rank#2#3
ConfidenceHigh confidenceHigh confidence
External Reputation6293
AI Authority5728
Web Authority7556
Expert Assessment7668
TOP10 User Score
Pricing0.20 bps x trade value, USD 2.00 minimum per order (Tier I, spot currencies) · free tier: None — no account minimums claimed, but no free trading tier£0 / €0 commission on real stocks and ETFs · free tier: Free account opening and holding, free demo account, no inactivity or account fee
Pricing modelUsage-based (per-trade commission, tiered by monthly volume)Usage-based
Best forEuropean self-directed traders placing large FX tickets (roughly USD 1m+ notional per order) who want explicit commission pricing and FX inside a broad multi-asset account.First-time UK or EU investors putting small, regular amounts into global stocks and ETFs from a phone, holding for years, who will enable cash interest and fund the multi-currency wallet to avoid FX charges.
Avoid if You place frequent small FX orders or constantly amend orders — the per-order minimum and cancel-and-replace commission treatment push effective costs far above the advertised rate. You need phone support or fast resolution of verification, account or withdrawal problems, you are an active or advanced trader needing full order types and tight spreads, or you want funds, bonds, advice-led products or a desktop terminal.
MarketsRetail self-directed traders, Active/high-volume traders, Professional tradersRetail investors, Beginners, Buy-and-hold investors
Founded2006
HeadquartersLondon, United Kingdom

A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.