Head to head
Kraken Pro vs Crypto.com Exchange
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
50/100Higher score | 38/100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #3 | #5 |
| Confidence | High confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 15 | — |
| AI Authority | 81 | 14 |
| Web Authority | 51 | 55 |
| Expert Assessment | 64 | 52 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | 0.40% maker / 0.80% taker on spot crypto at Tier 1 ($0+ volume) · free tier: None — no subscription; Tier 1 spot pricing is 0.40% maker / 0.80% taker | Not published — the canonical Fees & Limits page is JavaScript-gated and served no fee table to retrieval · free tier: None — no plan ladder; G2 records "Entry-Level Pricing: No pricing available" |
| Pricing model | Usage-based (per-trade maker/taker fees; no subscription for Kraken Pro) | Usage-based |
| Best for | Active order-book traders doing $10k+/month, API and margin traders, stablecoin/FX pair traders, and long-term holders with $20k+ on-platform who can passively buy down their fee tier. | High-volume spot and derivatives traders who will lock CRO to reach 0% maker fees and rebates, value instrument breadth, and keep their own independent transaction records. |
| Avoid if | You are a buy-and-hold retail user who will never open the Pro interface (you will pay 1%-1.5% plus spread), you cannot accept exchange custody risk given the visible 'funds on hold' complaint theme, you use leverage and are sensitive to a 2% liquidation fee, or you are outside the US wanting stocks or in a restricted geo for Perps. | You cannot tolerate an account freeze or a stalled withdrawal, you need responsive human support, you are a beginner buying small amounts at an undisclosed variable admin fee, you need multi-year tax exports or US tax forms, or you require documented proof-of-reserves and custody insurance before depositing. |
| Markets | Retail traders, Active/professional traders, API and algorithmic traders, High-balance holders, OTC / institutional | Retail traders, SMB |
| Founded | 2011 | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.