Head to head

Nuclino vs Onyx

Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.

 
40/100Higher score
19/100
Category rank#9#11
ConfidenceMedium confidenceMedium confidence
External Reputation72
AI Authority25
Web Authority2711
Expert Assessment5854
TOP10 User Score
PricingNot published (vendor pricing page price fields did not render; third-party figures conflict between $6 and $8/user/month) · free tier: Free plan: up to 50 items, up to 3 canvases, 2GB total storage, basic email support; Starter includes a 14-day trial with no credit card requiredNot published · free tier: Free-to-start path exists via cloud.onyx.app signup; open-source self-host build available at no stated price
Pricing modelSubscriptionFreemium / Subscription (details unverified)
Best forTeams of roughly 5-50 in software, IT services, games and startups that want a fast, clean internal wiki people will actually adopt, with graph/board navigation and optional public docs publishing.Engineering-resourced teams that want an AI knowledge interface over their existing tools, need to control their own LLM choice, and have a compliance or cost reason to self-host instead of buying Glean-class SaaS.
Avoid if You need SCIM provisioning, IdP group sync, attachment search, database-style tables, deep API automation, published enterprise pricing, or you have many read-only viewers and guests who would each be billed as users. You want an authored, structured wiki, have no DevOps capacity for a self-hosted deployment, or need published per-seat pricing and verified peer reviews before you commit.
MarketsSMB, Startups, Mid-market, IT & Software teams, Game studiosEnterprise, Mid-market, Engineering-led teams
Founded
Headquarters

A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.