Head to head
Semaphore vs Buildkite
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
47/100 | 49/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #7 | #6 |
| Confidence | High confidence | Medium confidence |
| External Reputation | 76 | 73 |
| AI Authority | 22 | 33 |
| Web Authority | 16 | 21 |
| Expert Assessment | 71 | 69 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | $0.003 per minute (Ubuntu ARM 2 vCPU); Ubuntu x64 2 vCPU $0.0075/min; self-hosted $0.0025/min · free tier: $15/month in free credits (~2,000 Ubuntu x64 2-vCPU minutes), 20 concurrent jobs by default, artifacts free to 20 GB/month egress and 100 GB/month storage; free support covers only account setup, projects and Git integration | USD $30 per active user/month (Pro) · free tier: Free plan $0: up to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2,000 Linux vCPU minutes/month, 250k test executions/month, dynamic pipelines, community support, 30-day build/artifact retention; plus a 30-day all-access trial of Free or Pro with no credit card and a dedicated Developer Success Engineer |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Subscription with usage-based overages |
| Best for | Teams of roughly 5-150 engineers running frequent Linux, ARM or container builds who are unhappy with pipeline wall-clock time, want per-minute billing with no seat tax, and are willing to pay for fast human support or to self-host via Community Edition. | Engineering organisations of roughly 50+ engineers with a platform or SRE team, running monorepos, Bazel, large test suites or macOS/mobile builds, who need build execution inside their own security boundary — including teams migrating off self-managed Jenkins. |
| Avoid if | Your workflow already lives entirely in GitHub or GitLab, you are macOS/iOS-dominant, you need a contractual response-time SLA on a small budget, you require verified SOC 2 / ISO 27001 evidence up front, or you need flexible refunds and mid-term cancellation. | You have fewer than ~10 engineers or no infrastructure owner, want a zero-ops fully hosted runner, need audit logs/SCIM/private log storage on a Pro budget, need ephemeral preview or staging environments, or require a published enterprise price before engaging sales. |
| Markets | SMB, Mid-Market, Agencies, Enterprise (Hybrid/Enterprise editions) | Mid-market, Enterprise, Platform/DevOps teams |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.