Head to head
Tapfiliate vs Track360
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
51/100Higher score | 37/100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #3 | #6 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | Medium confidence |
| External Reputation | 72 | — |
| AI Authority | — | — |
| Web Authority | 16 | 18 |
| Expert Assessment | 56 | 61 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | $89/mo (Launch), or $74/mo billed annually ($890/year) · free tier: No free plan; 7-day trial on Launch, 14-day on Scale, 30-day on Enterprise by request | Not published · free tier: FAQ references a 'free first month' but the answer did not render — terms unverified |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Custom |
| Best for | A SaaS, ecommerce or subscription brand launching or running its own in-house affiliate program at modest to mid volume, that wants predictable flat-fee cost with no revenue share and values fast setup, invite-only programs, recurring commissions or MLM tiers. | Forex/CFD brokers, prop trading firms and iGaming operators running complex multi-tier IB or affiliate programmes — lot-based rebates, upline/downline splits, KPI-triggered payouts — with in-house technical resource to use the open API and appetite to invest in configuration, especially multi-brand operators leaving spreadsheets or a per-module legacy platform. |
| Avoid if | You want a network with existing affiliate supply, need a published enterprise price for procurement, require deep custom analytics or heavy workflow automation, run very high volumes where overage fees bite, or cannot reliably manage a trial-to-paid transition given the strict 14-day refund window. | You need a published price to budget or shortlist, run a small e-commerce or SaaS affiliate programme, require a deep verifiable peer-review base for procurement, want plug-and-play setup, or have hard SOC 2 / ISO 27001 requirements. |
| Markets | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise, SaaS, Ecommerce, Subscription services | iGaming operators, Forex/CFD brokers, Prop trading firms, Multi-brand operators, Enterprise |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | Netherlands | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.