Head to head
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Supabase
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
50/100 | 55/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #4 | #2 |
| Confidence | High confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 72 | 65 |
| AI Authority | 25 | 59 |
| Web Authority | 35 | 27 |
| Expert Assessment | 67 | 66 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published — vCore price cells render client-side per region/currency and resolved to placeholders when retrieved · free tier: With an Azure free account: up to 750 hours of Burstable compute and 32 GB of storage per month for 12 months at no cost | Pro from $25/mo (additional projects from $10/mo) · free tier: $0/mo: unlimited API requests, 50,000 MAU, 500 MB database, shared CPU/500 MB RAM, 5 GB egress, 5 GB cached egress, 1 GB file storage, community support; projects paused after 1 week of inactivity, max 2 active projects, no backups/PITR/branching |
| Pricing model | Usage-based (per compute SKU plus storage; pay-as-you-go, savings plan, or 1/3-year reservations) | Subscription with usage-based add-ons |
| Best for | Organisations already standardised on Azure identity, networking and enterprise agreements that need managed PostgreSQL with zone-redundant HA, in-database vector search, or Azure Government regions, and that can commit to reservations or a savings plan for predictable workloads. | Small to mid-sized product teams with at least one SQL-comfortable engineer who need a relational database plus auth, storage and realtime from a single open-source vendor and want to ship fast. |
| Avoid if | You need a firm published monthly price before procurement, may need to shrink storage after right-sizing, cannot tolerate platform-initiated maintenance windows, or are not otherwise on Azure — outside the ecosystem the differentiators shrink. | You are a non-technical builder, need SOC 2/ISO 27001/SSO/HIPAA at modest spend, require annual invoicing and procurement-friendly terms, want only a plain managed database, or cannot tolerate a billing dispute turning into a service suspension. |
| Markets | SMB, Enterprise, Public Sector, Startups | SMB, Startups, Mid-Market, Enterprise (custom tier) |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | Redmond, Washington, USA | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.