Head to head
Celoxis vs Smartsheet
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
44/100 | 52/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #3 | #2 |
| Confidence | High confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 85 | 88 |
| AI Authority | 0 | 29 |
| Web Authority | 21 | 21 |
| Expert Assessment | 64 | 61 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | USD $10 per Standard user/month (Core), prepaid annually, minimum 5 full-access users (~$600/year floor) · free tier: None — free trial only; vendor FAQ states a no-obligation 14-day free trial, no credit card required, and no free version | Pro: $9/user/month billed annually ($108/year) per G2 and tech.co — UNCONFIRMED against the vendor pricing page · free tier: None currently evidenced — tech.co (Dec 2025) reports the limited free plan was discontinued in 2025, leaving only a 30-day free trial |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription (per-editor seat licensing) |
| Best for | Mid-market to enterprise PMOs, professional-services firms and IT/engineering organisations running many concurrent projects that need scheduling, capacity planning, costing, billing and executive BI natively, and that have an admin willing to configure the system. | Mid-market and enterprise organisations with 10+ paid editors and a dedicated PM/PMO function running process-heavy portfolios that need dashboards, cross-project reporting, SSO and enterprise controls — and that will budget separately for training and premium support. |
| Avoid if | You are a team under 5 people, want a free tier or a refundable trial path, need mobile-first field usage, or expect instant onboarding without dedicated admin resource. | You are a small team, freelancer or budget-constrained nonprofit, need zero-training adoption, rely on included responsive human support and flexible cancellation, or have an unusual workflow that will fight the grid model. |
| Markets | Mid-market, Enterprise, PMOs, Professional services, IT and engineering organisations | Mid-Market, Enterprise, PMO / programme management teams |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.