Head to head

Gusto vs Paylocity

Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.

 
62/100Higher score
46/100
Category rank#3#7
ConfidenceHigh confidenceHigh confidence
External Reputation9271
AI Authority6925
Web Authority2323
Expert Assessment4662
TOP10 User Score
PricingReported at USD $35/month + $6 per contractor (Contractor Only) — not vendor-verified · free tier: None published or verifiedNot published · free tier: None
Pricing modelSubscription (base fee plus per-person fee, with paid add-ons)Custom
Best forUS small businesses with roughly 1–50 salaried W-2 employees or heavy contractor use, with straightforward payroll, who value fast self-service setup and bundled benefits administration over hands-on account management.US-based organisations of roughly 100-1,000+ employees consolidating payroll, benefits, time, talent, spend and IT provisioning onto one employee record, with budget for premium PEPM pricing and procurement able to negotiate a quote.
Avoid if You need a responsive human on the phone when payroll breaks, run shift-based, multi-location or high-volume-hiring operations, require non-standard payroll customisation, are headcount-heavy enough that per-employee fees dominate, or are mid-way through a business banking change. You employ people outside the United States, need a non-English employee UI, are a very small team wanting transparent self-serve pricing, cannot negotiate a quote, or treat employee-facing support quality as the deciding factor.
MarketsSMB, Mid-Market, Contractor-heavy businessesSMB, Midmarket, Enterprise, Accountants, Benefit brokers
Founded
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado, USA (offices also in San Francisco and New York)Schaumburg, Illinois, United States

A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.