Head to head
Keycloak vs Okta Customer Identity Cloud
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
38/100 | 55/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #12 | #2 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | Medium confidence |
| External Reputation | — | 78 |
| AI Authority | 32 | 49 |
| Web Authority | 27 | 23 |
| Expert Assessment | 64 | 64 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published · free tier: Entire community edition is free to download and self-host; no plan ladder, no per-user or per-MAU metering | B2C Essentials from $35/month (500 MAU); B2B Essentials from $150/month (500 MAU) · free tier: $0/mo, no credit card, up to 25,000 monthly active users, 1 custom domain, passwordless, unlimited social connections, 5 Organizations, basic attack protection, community support, 1 Enterprise Connection, self-service SSO and SCIM; separately a 30-day free trial on Okta Customer Identity |
| Pricing model | Open source self-hosted (no licence fee); commercial support only via Red Hat subscription bundles | Subscription (MAU-based tiers) plus sales-led custom |
| Best for | Organisations with in-house platform/DevOps and Java/Kubernetes skills that want to run identity as infrastructure — especially high user volumes where per-MAU SaaS pricing dominates the budget, air-gapped or data-residency deployments, teams needing deep customisation, and existing Red Hat OpenShift Platform Plus, Application Foundations or Red Hat SSO customers. | Product and engineering teams under ~25,000 MAU who want to ship customer login fast on the free tier, and B2B SaaS vendors needing multi-tenant Organizations, enterprise SSO and SCIM without building federation themselves. |
| Avoid if | You have no dedicated ops capacity to absorb upgrade breakage, need a published self-serve price and formal SLA for vendor support, rely on non-technical administrators who need an intuitive console, need mature access certification and entitlement reviews in production today, or require a large verified public review corpus for procurement. | You run a high-volume, low-ARPU consumer app where MAU pricing plus next-tier-up billing decouples cost from revenue, you need multi-year budget certainty, you only need basic login/logout, or you want to self-host. |
| Markets | Enterprise, Mid-market, Public sector, Engineering-led SMB | Startups, SMB, B2B SaaS, Enterprise |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.