Head to head
Nuclino vs Confluence
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
40/100 | 65/100Higher score | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #9 | #1 |
| Confidence | Medium confidence | High confidence |
| External Reputation | 72 | 83 |
| AI Authority | 2 | 71 |
| Web Authority | 27 | 33 |
| Expert Assessment | 58 | 62 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Not published (vendor pricing page price fields did not render; third-party figures conflict between $6 and $8/user/month) · free tier: Free plan: up to 50 items, up to 3 canvases, 2GB total storage, basic email support; Starter includes a 14-day trial with no credit card required | Standard $5.16 per user (G2 block labelled "Pricing provided by Confluence"; billing period and currency not verified) · free tier: Free plan available; G2's vendor-supplied block lists it at 10 users |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Subscription (per-seat), with a free tier |
| Best for | Teams of roughly 5-50 in software, IT services, games and startups that want a fast, clean internal wiki people will actually adopt, with graph/board navigation and optional public docs publishing. | Organisations already running Jira that have a dedicated admin or documentation owner to enforce space naming, hierarchy and permission conventions, and that need governed, versioned, permissioned internal documentation — including regulated or large enterprises wanting self-hosted Data Center deployment. |
| Avoid if | You need SCIM provisioning, IdP group sync, attachment search, database-style tables, deep API automation, published enterprise pricing, or you have many read-only viewers and guests who would each be billed as users. | You are a small team with no dedicated admin, your primary requirement is fast forgiving search across a large corpus, you are Microsoft-centric, you want a lightweight minimal writing surface, or you are budgeting on headline seat price without modelling marketplace app spend. |
| Markets | SMB, Startups, Mid-market, IT & Software teams, Game studios | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise, Software & IT teams, Product and project teams |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | — |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.