Head to head
SAP Concur (Concur Expense) vs Navan
Both platforms are scored with the same methodology and the same category rubric. Nothing on this page is influenced by advertising.
41/100Higher score | 21/100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category rank | #5 | #6 |
| Confidence | High confidence | Medium confidence |
| External Reputation | 68 | — |
| AI Authority | 21 | 3 |
| Web Authority | 16 | 16 |
| Expert Assessment | 55 | 59 |
| TOP10 User Score | — | — |
| Pricing | Base: starting at $7 per report, unlimited users (includes Concur Expense) · free tier: No free version; free trial available (per Capterra) | USD $15 per user per month (expense, after the first 5 active users) · free tier: Navan Business is free for companies up to 300 employees: unlimited travel bookings at no cost, plus expense free for the first 5 monthly active expensing users |
| Pricing model | Subscription priced per expense report, with volume-tiered rates based on monthly commitment | Freemium + per-active-user subscription (Enterprise custom) |
| Best for | Enterprises and upper-mid-market firms with heavy business travel, multi-entity or multi-country operations, strict per-diem or government-contracting compliance requirements, an existing SAP or major-ERP footprint, and finance-ops headcount to run the configuration. | Companies under 300 employees with meaningful business travel that are willing to consolidate booking into Navan, and finance teams wanting a single system of record for trips, card spend and expenses. |
| Avoid if | You are a small business or startup wanting fast self-serve setup, you rank employee experience highly, you need transparent all-in pricing before engaging sales, or you cannot commit to a multi-year contract with defined termination terms. | You have little or no travel spend, are crossing 300 employees and need a budgetable number today, intend to keep an incumbent TMC, or require a fully published rate card including transactional fees for procurement sign-off. |
| Markets | Enterprise, Mid-Market, SMB, Government and government contractors | SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise |
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, Washington, United States | Palo Alto, California, United States |
A higher TOP SCORE means more of the evidence favours that platform on this methodology — it is not a recommendation, and it does not account for your specific requirements. Advertisers are never declared the winner of a comparison.